שמואל א, פרק א׳, פסוק כ״ח

I Samuel 1:28Sefaria

וְגַ֣ם אָנֹכִ֗י הִשְׁאִלְתִּ֙הוּ֙ לַֽיהֹוָ֔ה כׇּל־הַיָּמִים֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר הָיָ֔ה ה֥וּא שָׁא֖וּל לַיהֹוָ֑ה וַיִּשְׁתַּ֥חוּ שָׁ֖ם לַֽיהֹוָֽה׃ {ס}

A mother brings her profound promise to completion by arriving at the Tabernacle to formally and absolutely surrender her young son to a life of holy service. This act is deeply rooted in a concept of asking and lending [מצודת ציון, מלבי״ם], creating a closed circle with her original prayer. Just as God answered her initial plea, she now fulfills her condition by dedicating the child entirely to Divine service [מצודת דוד, מלבי״ם, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Another perspective views this exchange as the return of a deposit. God essentially lent the boy to her, and now she returns the loan so the child can serve his Master, similar to a person lending an item or even a son to serve an authority [רד״ק, רש״י]. This moment also highlights her full partnership. Beyond her husband Elkanah consenting to the boy's Nazirite vow, she is completely and actively involved in his dedication [חומת אנך].

The timeframe of this dedication spans the entirety of the child's life in this world [רד״ק, מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Some commentators note that this lifelong commitment extends backward as well. Because he was dedicated as a Nazirite from the womb, he was already under Divine authority, eliminating any need to wait until he grew older [מלבי״ם]. Because he is entirely handed over to God [רד״ק, ביאור שטיינזלץ], his Nazirite vow is absolute and cannot be annulled [חומת אנך].

A fascinating legal point emerges from the idea of the child being a loan. If the boy is lent to God, God is considered the borrower who is obligated to protect the deposit and eventually return him to his mother. Consequently, Eli the priest lacks the authority to punish the youth [רש״י]. On a prophetic level, divine inspiration rested upon the mother in that moment, hinting that as long as the boy lived, the future King Saul would also be in existence [רד״ק].

The event concludes with a singular act of bowing, which commentators attribute to different figures. One approach suggests that it was the young boy himself who bowed, showing that even at merely two years old, he had already been trained to worship and serve God [רש״י, רד״ק, רלב״ג]. Another view attributes the bowing to his father, Elkanah, either as a respectful gesture of taking leave from the house of God [רד״ק] or as an expression of deep gratitude that his son would be counted among those who serve God [מצודת דוד, רש״י]. Alternatively, Eli the priest may have bowed in thankfulness upon hearing how God answered the mother's prayer [רלב״ג], while others suggest that the act of bowing encompassed everyone present at the gathering [ביאור שטיינזלץ].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.