ישעיהו, פרק מ׳, פסוק כ״ז

Isaiah 40:27Sefaria

לָ֤מָּה תֹאמַר֙ יַעֲקֹ֔ב וּתְדַבֵּ֖ר יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל נִסְתְּרָ֤ה דַרְכִּי֙ מֵיְהֹוָ֔ה וּמֵאֱלֹהַ֖י מִשְׁפָּטִ֥י יַעֲבֽוֹר׃

From the depths of a long and grueling exile, a cry of deep despair and frustration arises. As a suffering nation watches wicked empires prosper and dominate them, profound doubts awaken regarding Divine providence and justice. The prophet steps forward to rebuke the people for their lack of trust and their grievances against heaven.

The primary approach among commentators is that these complaints reflect the profound sense of abandonment felt during the years of exile. The people feel that God has closed His eyes to their devotion. They argue that He ignores their faithful service and instead allows nations that do not even know Him to rule over them [רש״י, מצודת דוד]. This sense of being unseen extends to their personal struggles and hardships [רד״ק], as well as to their commitment to the Torah, for which they feel they receive no reward [חומת אנך].

Beyond feeling ignored, the people claim a severe miscarriage of justice. They believe the reward that should have been granted to them has been entirely removed from before God [רש״י, מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Alternatively, they argue that the punishment rightfully deserved by their oppressors has been forgotten and left unaddressed [רד״ק, צאינה וראינה]. Although these are incredibly harsh claims, they are not rooted in absolute heresy. Rather, they are the bitter cries of a tortured and suffering soul [שד״ל]. Still, these cries reveal heavy philosophical doubts. The people question whether God is truly aware of human actions, or, if He is aware, whether He simply chooses to look away and abandon them to their misery [אברבנאל, אבן עזרא].

The prophet addresses the nation by highlighting a divide in both social class and thought. One title used for the nation represents the general masses, while another symbolizes the wise leaders. Accordingly, the masses express their frustration with simple, brief statements, merely claiming that God does not watch over them. In contrast, the wise articulate a much more complex, philosophical argument. They contend that His absolute foreknowledge actually negates human free will, thereby removing any justification for reward and punishment [מלבי״ם]. This intellectual struggle underscores the limitations of the human mind, which falters when attempting to comprehend God's ways through pure logic alone [אהבת יהונתן].

This philosophical divide is further reflected in the specific ways the people refer to God in their complaints. When expressing that their lives are hidden from view, they direct their frustration at God as the Creator and First Cause, arguing that He does not involve Himself in the minor details of human life. However, when arguing that their justice has been bypassed, they direct their grievance at God in His role as the active, personal Supervisor. In this regard, the wise argue that precisely because God possesses absolute foreknowledge of all events, human actions are predetermined, rendering any system of judgment or justice completely invalid [מלבי״ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.