שמות, פרק ל״ד, פסוק י״ב

פרשת כי תשא

Exodus 34:12Sefaria

הִשָּׁ֣מֶר לְךָ֗ פֶּן־תִּכְרֹ֤ת בְּרִית֙ לְיוֹשֵׁ֣ב הָאָ֔רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֥ר אַתָּ֖ה בָּ֣א עָלֶ֑יהָ פֶּן־יִהְיֶ֥ה לְמוֹקֵ֖שׁ בְּקִרְבֶּֽךָ׃

Entering a new land naturally creates a tension between the desire to establish diplomatic relations with the local population and the vital need to protect a distinct spiritual identity. The caution against forming ties with the native nations is not merely a political guideline, but an existential shield meant to prevent assimilation and cultural decline. The primary approach among commentators is that the command to guard oneself in this matter carries the same weight as the prohibition against idolatry itself. Entering a covenant with God requires a complete refusal to form a competing treaty with the local nations [אבן עזרא, ביאור יש״ר, קאסוטו]. This warning is delivered specifically for the sensitive period of conquest, a time when the land is not yet cleared of idol worship, and the Israelites are tasked with inheriting the territory and becoming its masters [העמק דבר, קאסוטו].

The strictness of this separation developed historically. Before the sin of the Golden Calf, the Israelites were only restricted from making a joint treaty with both the nations and their gods; a purely political agreement with the people alone was permitted. However, following the spiritual failure of the Golden Calf, the standard was raised. Because the people's spiritual level had dropped, they were now forbidden from making any treaty whatsoever with the local inhabitants, even an entirely secular one, due to the severe risk of a spiritual collapse [העמק דבר].

The core danger is a hidden trap that corrupts behavior and draws the nation away from God [שטיינזלץ, קאסוטו]. Commentators outline this destructive process as gradual and largely unseen. The primary approach among commentators is that the spiritual decline begins simply through shared living spaces. Watching the locals worship their gods inevitably leads to imitation, assimilation, and eventually intermarriage [שד״ל, העמק דבר].

Others outline an even deeper psychological trap. The local inhabitants might pretend to be sincere converts to win the trust of the Israelites. Believing these false intentions, the Israelites might eat from their neighbors' feasts, completely unaware that the food was secretly dedicated to idols. This accidental sin lowers their spiritual defenses, paving the way for the next generation to marry local women and fall into open idol worship, much like what later happened to King Solomon [אלשיך]. Ultimately, an agreement that begins with a desire for neighborly closeness turns into an internal snare, consuming the nation from the inside out.

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.