ישעיהו, פרק ה׳, פסוק ד׳

Isaiah 5:4Sefaria

מַה־לַּעֲשׂ֥וֹת עוֹד֙ לְכַרְמִ֔י וְלֹ֥א עָשִׂ֖יתִי בּ֑וֹ מַדּ֧וּעַ קִוֵּ֛יתִי לַעֲשׂ֥וֹת עֲנָבִ֖ים וַיַּ֥עַשׂ בְּאֻשִֽׁים׃

A profound sense of divine disappointment echoes through the story of the vineyard. The Creator invested maximum effort and provided perfect conditions for His people, fully expecting a harvest of moral and spiritual goodness, only to be met with a bitter outcome. The stark contrast between this absolute dedication and the resulting failure forms the heart of the grievance.

The primary approach among commentators views the frustration over the vineyard as genuine astonishment. Every possible measure of care, cultivation, and protection was taken, leaving no good deed undone. The poetic repetition of the grievance serves to strengthen this point, highlighting the completeness of the effort [שד״ל]. Beneath the surface of the story, the vineyard represents the Israelites, and the care it received reflects a long history of spiritual and physical kindness.

This divine investment began early in history. God sifted for pure souls during the generation of the Dispersion, ultimately choosing the forefathers of the nation. He then provided the people with a complete system of Commandments intended to push away impurity, draw in holiness, and neutralize the evil inclination [חומת אנך]. Physically, this care took the form of settling the Israelites in the Land of Israel, an environment perfectly suited for spiritual and social harmony. God separated them from other nations and cleared away the Canaanites to prevent harmful influences. He provided each person with a designated inheritance of land, ensuring they had the freedom and resources to serve Him without any need to steal. Furthermore, He built the Temple to act as a protective watchtower and showered the nation with divine abundance [מלבי״ם].

Given this flawless preparation, the sudden yield of rotten produce raises a painful question. The expression of divine hope for a good harvest presents a philosophical challenge, as God possesses absolute knowledge of the future. However, this phrasing is a poetic device suited to the narrative. God's foreknowledge does not eliminate human free will. Therefore, within the context of the metaphor, His desire for a positive outcome is framed as a genuine expectation [חומת אנך].

This divine expectation was for a harvest of justice and righteousness, representing flawless conduct both in human relationships and in the relationship between the people and God. Instead, the vineyard yielded rotten, defective fruit. These spoiled crops symbolize a society plagued by oppression, robbery, and the perversion of justice [מלבי״ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.