A true moral awakening requires a gradual shift, beginning with a broad commitment to doing good and culminating in the active protection of society's most vulnerable members. It is not enough to simply follow the law in a technical sense; true justice demands rooting out corruption and fighting for those who cannot defend themselves.
The first step is an internal one. The call to learn to do good is specifically directed at self-education rather than teaching others [רש״י]. It is a process of breaking away from bad habits, conditioning oneself to perform good deeds, and discovering the proper way to treat other people [רד״ק, שד״ל, מלבי״ם, שטיינזלץ]. From this personal foundation comes a practical, public duty. Judges are called to seek out justice actively, thoroughly investigating cases to determine who is right in conflicts between the powerful and the oppressed [מצודת דוד, רד״ק, שד״ל, מלבי״ם].
This active pursuit of fairness focuses heavily on the victims of exploitation. The primary approach among commentators identifies these victims as individuals whose rights have been trampled by the powerful. This oppression goes beyond simple theft; it involves moral decay and the use of force to seize another's property [שד״ל, שטיינזלץ, מלבי״ם, מצודת ציון]. The responsibility of the courts toward these victims takes several forms. Judges must strengthen the broken spirits of those who have been ruined by exploitation [רש״י, שד״ל]. They are also tasked with straightening out twisted situations to rescue stolen property [רד״ק, מצודת ציון, אבן עזרא], and guiding the victims along the right legal path so they can successfully reclaim what is theirs [רש״י, מלבי״ם].
A different tradition approaches this instruction to the courts as a warning against rushing to judgment. Judges are advised to let the legal process pause and develop, taking the time to carefully examine the details before issuing a verdict [רד״ק, אבן עזרא]. On a more personal, allegorical level, the struggle against the oppressor is seen as the internal battle against the evil inclination. It is a call to strengthen the heart against temptation and transform negative urges into a positive force that drives a person to do good [אהבת יהונתן].
The moral demand finally focuses on the ultimate symbols of social helplessness: the orphan and the widow. The justice system is warned not to abandon these individuals simply because they lack the influence to fight their own legal battles [רש״י, שד״ל, רד״ק, שטיינזלץ]. A fascinating distinction is made between the legal needs of the orphan and those of the widow. An orphan's rights, such as their share in an inheritance, are usually clearly defined by Biblical law. Therefore, the court only needs to execute judgment, stepping in to apply the law for a child who is too young to claim it. A widow's rights, however, such as her living expenses and financial settlement, are often contested. Heirs frequently challenge her claims with denials and complex arguments. Because her situation is so disputed, the court must do more than just judge; the judges must actively argue on her behalf, fighting her legal battles until the truth is revealed and justice is served [מלבי״ם].