שמות, פרק כ״ה, פסוק ט״ו

פרשת תרומה

Exodus 25:15Sefaria

בְּטַבְּעֹת֙ הָאָרֹ֔ן יִהְי֖וּ הַבַּדִּ֑ים לֹ֥א יָסֻ֖רוּ מִמֶּֽנּוּ׃

The Ark of the Covenant, the most sacred vessel in the Tabernacle, possessed a unique structural feature regarding its carrying poles. Unlike other sacred objects whose poles were inserted only in preparation for travel, the poles of the Ark were an inseparable part of its very essence. A dual directive establishes this permanence: the poles must be placed in the rings, and they must never be removed. The primary approach among commentators is that this repetition serves to emphasize an absolute, eternal fixture. Had the poles been merely functional tools for transportation, the initial instruction would have sufficed. Instead, the supplementary warning establishes a strict prohibition against withdrawing them, even when the Ark rested undisturbed in the Holy of Holies [מזרחי, שפתי חכמים, גור אריה, העמק דבר]. Violating this rule is considered a severe transgression of a negative commandment, carrying the penalty of lashes [רבנו בחיי, תורה תמימה, פרדס יוסף].

Several conceptual and practical reasons explain this permanent arrangement. Primarily, it reflects the immense holiness and the profound awe commanded by the Ark. God intended to prevent human hands from unnecessarily manipulating the sacred vessel to insert or extract the poles. Because the poles were always in place, those assigned to carry the Ark could simply grasp the ends and immediately step back out of reverence once it was set down [דעת זקנים, בכור שור, חזקוני]. Beyond mere utility, the poles functioned as an integral ornament, contributing to the majesty of the Ark. Just as the Menorah was kindled during the day to show its purpose transcended physical illumination, the continuous presence of the poles testified to their intrinsic importance [תורה תמימה, פרדס יוסף, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. This constant readiness also suited the Ark's role in festive processions, such as the conquest of Jericho, requiring it to be prepared for movement at any moment [קאסוטו]. Practically speaking, the Ark stood isolated in the Holy of Holies, so its protruding poles caused no obstruction. This contrasts with the Copper Altar, which stood in a crowded courtyard where permanent poles would have hindered the people [חזקוני].

The physical design of these poles is widely discussed, particularly to resolve apparent contradictions elsewhere in the Biblical narrative. While the instruction forbids removing the poles, other passages use language implying they were brought in and out. To reconcile this, commentators explain that the poles were designed with thick ends and a thinner middle. This specific shape allowed them to slide back and forth within the rings, yet the thick ends prevented them from slipping out entirely [רבנו בחיי, תורה תמימה, ריב״א, ביאור יש״ר, חזקוני]. Thus, the prohibition specifically forbids removing them completely from the Ark [אור החיים]. Conversely, another perspective suggests the poles were wedged into the rings with extreme tightness. This rigid placement served a vital safety purpose: during travel over steep terrain, a loose, heavy Ark could slide along the poles and crush the shoulders of the priests carrying it [ריב״א, חזקוני].

Another challenge arises from instructions given prior to travel, which dictate that the priests must put the poles in place, implying they were absent beforehand. Some explain that this does not refer to inserting the poles into the rings, but rather to properly arranging them on the shoulders of the bearers [אור החיים, ברטנורא, בכור שור]. Another explanation suggests that while Moses initially inserted the poles, God desired the priests to perform an official act of placement, after which they were never removed again [בכור שור, חזקוני]. A completely different approach argues that the Ark actually featured eight rings and four poles. According to this view, two poles remained permanently fixed in four rings, while two additional poles were inserted into the extra rings solely for the journey [פני דוד, ברטנורא]. However, this theory faces strong opposition from other commentators who firmly maintain that the Ark possessed only four rings and two poles [אור החיים].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.