שמות, פרק כ״ה, פסוק י״ח

פרשת תרומה

Exodus 25:18Sefaria

וְעָשִׂ֛יתָ שְׁנַ֥יִם כְּרֻבִ֖ים זָהָ֑ב מִקְשָׁה֙ תַּעֲשֶׂ֣ה אֹתָ֔ם מִשְּׁנֵ֖י קְצ֥וֹת הַכַּפֹּֽרֶת׃

Above the Ark of the Covenant, in the innermost sanctum, stood wondrous figures that served as the focal point of Divine revelation and a symbol of the profound bond between God and Israel. Although the Torah strictly forbids the creation of statues, these figures were permitted because they were never intended for worship. Instead, they represented the heavenly Throne of Glory and holy celestial creatures [חזקוני, בכור שור].

The exact appearance of these figures is a matter of profound discussion. The primary approach among commentators is that their faces resembled that of a young child [רש״י, ברטנורא, שפתי חכמים]. The image of an infant symbolizes pure innocence, a state free from sin, and a readiness to accept the Torah. It also reflects God's deep, unconditional love for Israel, much like a father's love for his child [נחל קדומים, שפתי כהן, תורה תמימה]. However, other traditions envision them differently. Some maintain they were large, majestic birds with wings [רשב״ם, חזקוני]. Others describe them as complex celestial beings that formed a kind of Divine chariot [שד״ל]. Challenging the concept of a childlike face, this view suggests the very identity of the figures relates to the concept of God riding upon His heavenly chariot. While some reject the traditional childlike imagery based on linguistic grounds [אבן עזרא], defenders of the tradition explain that the term simply evolved into an independent name for these specific, innocent figures [מזרחי, גור אריה].

The command specifically requires the creation of two figures. This multiplicity was intentional, designed to prevent the misconception of dual deities and to ensure no single figure became an object of worship [רבנו בחיי]. The pair also hints at the two primary attributes through which God governs the world, strict justice and profound mercy [פענח רזא, שפתי כהן]. Furthermore, the specific phrasing used to describe the pair implies they were not identical. Many understand that they were designed as male and female, serving as a powerful symbol of the fierce, intimate love between God, who gives, and Israel, who receives [העמק דבר, רבנו בחיי, הכתב והקבלה, מלבי״ם]. Conversely, another perspective argues that both figures were male in form, yet they were physically intertwined and embracing, vividly demonstrating God's deep affection for Israel [תורה תמימה].

The creation of these figures demanded extraordinary craftsmanship. The accepted understanding is that they were not fashioned separately and later attached to the cover of the Ark. Rather, they were hammered into existence from a single, massive block of gold, with the figures emerging naturally from the base [רש״י, רשב״ם, ביאור יש״ר, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. This physical, material unity was intended to symbolize a deeper spiritual unity [שפתי כהן]. The gold itself had to be completely solid and hard, rather than hollow or made of gold-plated wood [שד״ל, מלבי״ם], which implies that simple hammering would not suffice and specialized engraving tools were required [שד״ל]. A different interpretation suggests the structural command simply meant the figures had to be positioned at an equal distance from the center [אבן עזרא].

Finally, the figures were positioned precisely at the two far ends of the Ark's length, facing one another. This specific orientation was crucial. Had they been placed along the width of the Ark, their backs would have faced the Tent of Meeting, and their physical forms would have obstructed the Divine voice that emanated from the space between them [מזרחי, שפתי חכמים].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.