בראשית, פרק כ״ו, פסוק כ״ז

פרשת תולדות

Genesis 26:27Sefaria

וַיֹּ֤אמֶר אֲלֵהֶם֙ יִצְחָ֔ק מַדּ֖וּעַ בָּאתֶ֣ם אֵלָ֑י וְאַתֶּם֙ שְׂנֵאתֶ֣ם אֹתִ֔י וַתְּשַׁלְּח֖וּנִי מֵאִתְּכֶֽם׃

A diplomatic meeting between leaders usually begins with royal etiquette and formal pleasantries. However, Isaac chooses to receive the delegation from the king of Gerar with a direct, piercing question, stripping away all formality. He confronts them with their hostile past and questions the true motives behind their sudden friendly visit.

Isaac presents the delegation with a logical paradox [מלבי״ם]. He assumes they have arrived either for peace or for war. If they come seeking friendship, it contradicts the intense hatred they previously showed him. On the other hand, if their intent is war, the timing is baffling. When Isaac lived under their rule, they settled for merely exiling him without physical harm; it makes no sense to attack him now that he is an independent leader. He essentially traps them in a contradiction: if they care for him, why did they drive him away? And if they despise him, why are they visiting him now? [ביאור ישר].

Knowing that his father Abraham had already established a peace treaty with them—a pact Isaac would never break—he understands they have no practical need to secure a new agreement. Therefore, he concludes that their long journey from Gerar to his current home in Beersheba [רבנו בחיי] is entirely self-serving. They have come to appease him and quiet their own anxieties about his growing power [אור החיים]. By addressing them with such bluntness, Isaac also makes it clear that he is completely unfazed and unintimidated by the royal envoy [העמק דבר].

He then directly addresses the root of their animosity, pointing out that their hatred was born out of deep jealousy over his wealth and success [אור החיים, רבנו בחיי]. This was not a resentment held only by the common people, but a hostility shared by the king and his top ministers [אור החיים]. The ultimate proof of this hatred was his expulsion [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. The king, acting on the advice of his officials, had explicitly ordered Isaac to leave [רד״ק, רבנו בחיי]. This act of banishment was not just an insult; it was a severe violation of the long-standing peace established during Abraham's time [פני דוד].

Because hatred fueled by jealousy rarely fades as long as the target of that envy remains successful, Isaac expresses deep skepticism about their sudden display of goodwill. He challenges them, wondering what kind of affection they could possibly expect from him after they so clearly proved their hostility [אור החיים, העמק דבר].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.