ירמיהו, פרק ז׳, פסוק ל״א

Jeremiah 7:31Sefaria

וּבָנ֞וּ בָּמ֣וֹת הַתֹּ֗פֶת אֲשֶׁר֙ בְּגֵ֣יא בֶן־הִנֹּ֔ם לִשְׂרֹ֛ף אֶת־בְּנֵיהֶ֥ם וְאֶת־בְּנֹתֵיהֶ֖ם בָּאֵ֑שׁ אֲשֶׁר֙ לֹ֣א צִוִּ֔יתִי וְלֹ֥א עָלְתָ֖ה עַל־לִבִּֽי׃ {פ}

A brutal practice reveals the sharp contrast between the cruelty of idol worship and the moral standards set by God. In an unimaginable display of misplaced devotion, parents would offer their own children as sacrifices, a custom God utterly rejects. Just outside Jerusalem, in a valley used for various rituals [ביאור שטיינזלץ], people built altars and structures [מצודת ציון, צאינה וראינה]. The focal point of this worship was a place called Topheth, located in the Valley of Ben Hinnom [מצודת ציון].

These names carry a chilling history connected to the worship of the idol Molech. The idol was a copper statue, heated from below by a fire until its outstretched hands were glowing hot. A living child was then placed onto those burning hands. The name Topheth comes from the word for drum. During the ritual, priests would beat drums loudly to drown out the child's screams, ensuring the father would not hear the cries and be moved to pity. Similarly, the name Hinnom stems from the agonizing moans of the burning child [רש״י, מצודת דוד, צאינה וראינה]. The primary approach among commentators is that these children were literally burned alive. The people's obsession with idol worship was so intense that it completely erased their natural parental compassion [רד״ק]. However, another perspective suggests that in some cases, the ritual may have involved a symbolic passing of the children through the flames [ביאור שטיינזלץ].

God declares with absolute clarity that He never requested such atrocities. While He instructed the Israelites to bring animal offerings, He never asked for human beings to be burned, not even in His own name, and certainly not for a foreign god [רד״ק, מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Furthermore, God emphasizes that such a thought never even entered His mind, meaning it was never part of His will [מצודת דוד, רד״ק]. This firm rejection naturally raises a question about the Binding of Isaac, where God instructed Abraham to sacrifice his son. Commentators explain that even in that moment, God never intended for Isaac to actually be harmed. The command was given strictly as a test, designed to publicly show the immense faith and righteousness of both Abraham and Isaac [רש״י, צאינה וראינה].

Beyond the immediate context, this divine rejection also points to other tragic historical events. The idea of an uncommanded human sacrifice serves as a reference to Jephthah, who sacrificed his daughter without any divine instruction. Likewise, the concept of a sacrifice that never entered God's mind alludes to Mesha, the king of Moab, who offered his own firstborn son [רד״ק].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.