ויקרא, פרק ט״ז, פסוק כ׳

פרשת אחרי מות

Leviticus 16:20Sefaria

וְכִלָּה֙ מִכַּפֵּ֣ר אֶת־הַקֹּ֔דֶשׁ וְאֶת־אֹ֥הֶל מוֹעֵ֖ד וְאֶת־הַמִּזְבֵּ֑חַ וְהִקְרִ֖יב אֶת־הַשָּׂעִ֥יר הֶחָֽי׃

At the peak of Yom Kippur, after the High Priest finishes the innermost, hidden purification rituals, a sharp transition occurs. The focus shifts outward from the inner sanctuary to the courtyard, moving from the blood of a sacrifice to a live goat upon which the sins of the people will be confessed. The conclusion of this inner atonement process demands absolute perfection and strict order. The primary approach among commentators is that if the priest misses even a single sprinkling of blood, his work is invalid. This demand for flawless execution required the High Priest to act with great speed to manage the day's numerous tasks, and this swiftness ultimately secured the cleansing and purity of the people [תורה תמימה]. The conclusion of this phase signifies that the priest has completely finished all handling of the blood, including pouring the remainder at the base of the altar [מלבי״ם]. Unlike the outer altar, which requires constant sacrifices throughout the year, this inner Yom Kippur atonement is entirely finalized and completed until the following year [העמק דבר].

The inner atonement took place in three distinct locations: the Holy of Holies, where incense was offered and blood was sprinkled between the ark's poles; the Sanctuary, where blood was sprinkled on the dividing curtain; and the inner golden altar [ביאור יש״ר, מלבי״ם]. Each of these locations represents an independent stage of the process. Practically, if the collected blood were to spill while the priest moved between the Holy of Holies and the Sanctuary, or between the Sanctuary and the golden altar, he would not need to restart the entire day's service. Instead, he would simply bring new blood and resume exactly where he left off [מלבי״ם].

Once these inner tasks are finished, the priest steps out into the courtyard and approaches the goat that has been standing ready, preparing to lean his hands upon it and confess [רד״צ הופמן, שטיינזלץ, רלב״ג, ביאור יש״ר]. The commentators agree on a critical legal requirement regarding this second animal: it must remain alive until the blood application of the first, slaughtered goat is completely finished. If the live goat dies before the inner atonement is complete, the blood of the first goat is invalidated, forcing the priest to pour it out and begin the entire process anew.

Beyond this legal requirement, a profound conceptual contrast exists between the two goats. The first goat died and gave its blood inside the sanctuary, representing renewal, self-sacrifice, and the building of a pure future. In contrast, the second goat remains standing outside in full vitality. It symbolizes the life of the past—a life that did not enter the sanctuary through self-sacrifice. It is upon this unrefined past that the priest must now confess before sending the goat away into the wilderness [רש״ר הירש].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.