שמואל ב, פרק י״ג, פסוק א׳

II Samuel 13:1Sefaria

וַיְהִ֣י אַחֲרֵי־כֵ֗ן וּלְאַבְשָׁל֧וֹם בֶּן־דָּוִ֛ד אָח֥וֹת יָפָ֖ה וּשְׁמָ֣הּ תָּמָ֑ר וַיֶּאֱהָבֶ֖הָ אַמְנ֥וֹן בֶּן־דָּוִֽד׃

The events unfolding within David's royal household mark a tragic turning point, setting into motion a chain of disasters decreed upon the king. Following the death of his first child with Bathsheba, the focus shifts to his adult children, plunging the family into a web of intense desires and power struggles.

The primary approach among commentators views this sequence of events not merely as the next chapter in time, but as the direct realization of the punishments foretold by Nathan the prophet. David had previously declared that a sinner must pay fourfold for his crimes. With his first child already dead, the unfolding tragedy introduces the remaining three figures who will complete this harsh penalty: Amnon, Tamar, and Absalom. Together, they become entangled in calamities of incest and bloodshed, serving as a measure for measure consequence for David's own past actions [מלבי״ם, אלשיך, חומת אנך, אברבנאל]. However, a differing perspective suggests that these tragedies do not have a direct causal or chronological link to the earlier sins, but stand as independent events [ביאור שטיינזלץ].

A central issue in this narrative is Tamar's exact family status. She is distinctly identified as Absalom's sister, whereas Amnon and Absalom are known as David's sons. The primary approach among commentators explains that Tamar and Absalom shared the same mother, Maacah, a foreign princess whom David took captive in battle. According to this tradition, David fathered Tamar with Maacah before she formally converted to Judaism. Under Jewish law, a child born to a non-Jewish mother is not legally recognized as the father's offspring. Therefore, Tamar grew up in the palace essentially as a stepsister and was actually permitted to marry Amnon. Absalom, conversely, was born after Maacah had converted and married David, making him the king's legal son. The fact that Amnon chose a path of deceit and violence to take Tamar, rather than seeking to marry her legally, stemmed purely from his dark desires and a wish to avoid involving his father [מלבי״ם, מצודת דוד, רד״ק, אלשיך, ביאור שטיינזלץ].

A contrasting viewpoint firmly rejects the idea that Tamar was born outside the bounds of a sacred marriage. In this view, both Tamar and Absalom were born after Maacah's full conversion. Consequently, Tamar was David's legal daughter and Amnon's sister, meaning any relationship between them was strictly forbidden by the severe laws of incest. She is specifically linked to Absalom because they shared the same mother, likely lived in the same quarters, and ultimately because Absalom would be the one to avenge her honor. Under this interpretation, when Tamar later tells Amnon that the king would not deny her to him, she is not stating a legal reality. Instead, she is using a desperate stalling tactic, hoping to calm him down and escape the immediate danger [אברבנאל].

The root of the disaster lay in Amnon's unchecked infatuation. As David's firstborn son and the designated heir to the throne, Amnon's elevated status had accustomed him to a life of power, privilege, and immediate gratification. When his desire for Tamar was awakened, his deep sense of entitlement meant he was either completely unable or simply unwilling to restrain himself [ביאור שטיינזלץ].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.