ויקרא, פרק י״ג, פסוק ב׳

פרשת תזריע

Leviticus 13:2Sefaria

אָדָ֗ם כִּֽי־יִהְיֶ֤ה בְעוֹר־בְּשָׂרוֹ֙ שְׂאֵ֤ת אֽוֹ־סַפַּ֙חַת֙ א֣וֹ בַהֶ֔רֶת וְהָיָ֥ה בְעוֹר־בְּשָׂר֖וֹ לְנֶ֣גַע צָרָ֑עַת וְהוּבָא֙ אֶל־אַהֲרֹ֣ן הַכֹּהֵ֔ן א֛וֹ אֶל־אַחַ֥ד מִבָּנָ֖יו הַכֹּהֲנִֽים׃

A sudden blemish upon the skin is not merely a natural medical condition, but a profound miracle from God pointing to moral and religious failings [ספורנו, תולדות יצחק, רקנאטי, חומש קה״ת]. This spiritual affliction serves as both a punishment and a warning against specific sins, primarily gossip, arrogance, greed, and envy, urging the individual to repent before the condition worsens [כלי יקר, שפתי כהן, חומש קה״ת, פני דוד]. The laws governing this phenomenon apply universally to men, women, and even newborn infants [אור החיים, תורה תמימה, רש״ר הירש, חזקוני, שטיינזלץ]. However, it specifically strikes those of high spiritual stature within Israel, demonstrating that the affliction targets individuals capable of perfection who have momentarily stumbled [אור החיים, שפתי כהן, פרדס יוסף]. These laws took effect only from the giving of the Torah onward and do not apply to blemishes that existed beforehand [תורה תמימה, פירושי רד״צ הופמן]. Notably, the blemish remains entirely on the surface of the skin, emphasizing that the impurity is strictly external; it does not penetrate the body, and the person's soul remains perfectly pure [אור החיים].

When evaluating these blemishes, the assessment is tailored to the specific natural skin tone of the individual [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם]. The laws apply specifically to areas of the body that do not naturally grow hair, excluding the head and beard, which are governed by separate rules [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, ביאור יש״ר, חזקוני]. The primary approach among commentators is to categorize these blemishes into three distinct types, differentiated by their degree of whiteness [רש״י, רמב״ן, ספורנו, מזרחי, רבנו בחיי]. The first type is as white as clean wool. Because it is slightly less bright than the others, it creates a visual effect of being raised above the skin, much like a shadow cast against sunlight [רשב״ם, מזרחי, רש״ר הירש, נתינה לגר]. Alternatively, some connect its nature to fire, which naturally rises [אבן עזרא, רמב״ן, טור הארוך]. Spiritually, this raised mark symbolizes arrogance and a haughty spirit [כלי יקר, חומת אנך, שפתי כהן, מנחת עני]. The second type is not an independent mark, but a secondary one that attaches itself to the primary blemishes [רש״י, רמב״ן, רשב״ם, אור החיים, תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, אבן עזרא]. This represents the sin of greed, chasing after wealth which is secondary to human life, or the danger of attaching oneself to wicked company [כלי יקר, חומת אנך, שפתי כהן, מנחת עני]. The third mark is the brightest, gleaming intensely white like snow [רש״י, רמב״ן, רשב״ם, מלבי״ם, אבן עזרא, פירושי רד״צ הופמן]. This brilliant illumination reflects the sin of gossip, which drains the blood and "whitens" a friend's face in shame, or the sin of heresy, where a person attempts to justify and "whiten" their dark deeds [כלי יקר, חומת אנך, שפתי כהן, מנחת עני].

As the blemish develops, it becomes a noticeable and painful affliction [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, ביאור יש״ר]. Different types of marks can combine to reach the minimum size required to render a person impure [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, אדרת אליהו]. Yet, at this initial stage, it is not an absolute declaration of impurity, but rather a warning sign, offering the individual a window of time to repent [טור הארוך, רבנו בחיי, פירושי רד״צ הופמן]. If the condition persists, the afflicted person must be brought to a priest, even against their will, or the condition must be reported to him [ביאור יש״ר, חזקוני, שד״ל]. The authority to determine purity or impurity rests exclusively in the hands of the priest. Even if a great scholar expertly identifies the mark, the legal status remains invalid until a priest—even one lacking specialized knowledge—actually pronounces the words "pure" or "impure" under the scholar's guidance [רש״י, מזרחי, אדרת אליהו, חזקוני, פירושי רד״צ הופמן]. A single priest is sufficient for this declaration; a court of three is not required [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, אדרת אליהו]. This duty can even be performed by a priest with a physical blemish that disqualifies him from Temple service, though it excludes those who have been entirely stripped of their priesthood [תורה תמימה, מלבי״ם, צפנת פענח, חזקוני].

Placing this diagnosis specifically in the hands of the priest carries a profound educational message. Because this spiritual affliction stems from arrogance, gossip, and greed, the ultimate remedy is a personal encounter with the family of Aaron. These priests are legendary lovers and pursuers of peace who have completely cleansed themselves of harmful speech. They embody absolute humility and, having been given no land inheritance in Israel, are entirely free from the grip of greed. By standing before such figures, the afflicted individual draws the necessary inspiration to mend their character and heal their spiritual wounds [כלי יקר, חומש קה״ת, רקנאטי].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.