בראשית, פרק ל״ז, פסוק ב׳

פרשת וישב

Genesis 37:2Sefaria

אֵ֣לֶּה ׀ תֹּלְד֣וֹת יַעֲקֹ֗ב יוֹסֵ֞ף בֶּן־שְׁבַֽע־עֶשְׂרֵ֤ה שָׁנָה֙ הָיָ֨ה רֹעֶ֤ה אֶת־אֶחָיו֙ בַּצֹּ֔אן וְה֣וּא נַ֗עַר אֶת־בְּנֵ֥י בִלְהָ֛ה וְאֶת־בְּנֵ֥י זִלְפָּ֖ה נְשֵׁ֣י אָבִ֑יו וַיָּבֵ֥א יוֹסֵ֛ף אֶת־דִּבָּתָ֥ם רָעָ֖ה אֶל־אֲבִיהֶֽם׃

Following the peaceful settlement of Esau's descendants, the historical focus shifts to the turbulent events awaiting Jacob's family. The narrative immediately links Jacob's legacy directly to his son Joseph, bypassing the older brothers. This connection indicates that the unfolding history is not merely a genealogical list, but rather the chronicles and life events of Jacob's family [אבן עזרא, רשב״ם, רד״ק, ספורנו]. Joseph was the focal point of his father's life. He was the primary reason Jacob labored for Laban, he bore a striking physical resemblance to his father, and the major events of Jacob's life were mirrored in Joseph's own experiences [רש״י, רבנו בחיי]. Furthermore, this transition highlights a sharp contrast between expectation and reality. Jacob deeply desired to settle in tranquility, but the sudden onset of Joseph's agonizing ordeal shattered that peace, ultimately setting into motion the chain of events that would lead the entire family down to Egypt [רש״י, כלי יקר, אור החיים].

At seventeen years old, Joseph's age is noted to emphasize the painful twenty-two years of separation from his father that was about to begin, ending only when he stood before the Pharaoh during the years of famine [רשב״ם, שד״ל]. Additionally, his youth underscores his remarkable spiritual fortitude, as he maintained his righteousness during a stage of life when human impulses are exceptionally strong [אור החיים]. In the pastures, Joseph shepherded alongside his brothers. Some interpret his role as a leader who guided his older siblings with extraordinary wisdom [ספורנו, מלבי״ם, הכתב והקבלה], while others suggest that, as the younger brother, he accompanied them simply to learn the trade [רד״ק].

His youthfulness manifested in complex ways. One perspective suggests he exhibited typical adolescent vanity, carefully grooming himself and styling his hair [רש״י, רמב״ן]. Conversely, another approach understands his youthfulness as an expression of servitude and humility; despite his profound wisdom, Joseph acted as a humble servant to his brothers [אבן עזרא, שד״ל, העמק דבר, הכתב והקבלה]. This humility was particularly evident in his relationship with the sons of Bilhah and Zilpah. While the sons of Leah often looked down upon the sons of the handmaids with an air of superiority, Joseph actively befriended them and served them. He treated their mothers not as servants, but as fully emancipated, equal wives of his father [רש״י, רמב״ן, כלי יקר, מלבי״ם].

From this intricate family dynamic, Joseph brought a damaging report about his brothers to their father. He did not invent malicious lies. Rather, he reported the absolute truth exactly as he perceived it [רבנו בחיי, תורה תמימה]. The primary approach among commentators is that this report was directed against Leah's sons [רש״י, רשב״ם]. However, some maintain he actually reported on the sons of the handmaids with whom he associated, which explains why every single brother eventually agreed to sell him [רמב״ן]. A third view suggests he brought negative reports about both factions regarding their treatment of one another [מלבי״ם].

The accusations were severe. Joseph claimed his brothers were eating flesh torn from a living animal, degrading the handmaids' sons by calling them slaves, and engaging in sexual immorality [רש״י, רד״ק, תורה תמימה]. The brothers, who were righteous, were actually acting entirely within the bounds of the law, but Joseph's own extreme piety led him to misinterpret their actions and judge them too harshly. For instance, the brothers cut meat from a properly slaughtered animal while it was still twitching, a permitted practice, but Joseph mistakenly believed they were eating from a living creature. They engaged in standard business dealings with local women, which Joseph misconstrued as immoral behavior. Finally, they referred to the handmaids' sons by their factual lineage, which Joseph interpreted as a malicious slur meant to brand them as slaves [מזרחי, גור אריה, כלי יקר, הכתב והקבלה].

Joseph did not broadcast these accusations publicly. He brought them privately to their father with the pure intention that Jacob would correct the brothers and guide them on the proper path [מלבי״ם, הכתב והקבלה]. Nevertheless, because he chose to report them rather than judging them favorably or rebuking them directly, Joseph suffered a precise punishment for each of his three claims. For accusing them of eating from a living animal, the brothers later slaughtered a goat to dip his coat in its blood. For accusing them of calling their brothers slaves, he was sold into slavery. And for suspecting them of immorality, he was subjected to the seduction attempts of his master's wife [רש״י, רד״ק, תורה תמימה].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.