במדבר, פרק ל״א, פסוק ח׳

פרשת מטות

Numbers 31:8Sefaria

וְאֶת־מַלְכֵ֨י מִדְיָ֜ן הָרְג֣וּ עַל־חַלְלֵיהֶ֗ם אֶת־אֱוִ֤י וְאֶת־רֶ֙קֶם֙ וְאֶת־צ֤וּר וְאֶת־חוּר֙ וְאֶת־רֶ֔בַע חֲמֵ֖שֶׁת מַלְכֵ֣י מִדְיָ֑ן וְאֵת֙ בִּלְעָ֣ם בֶּן־בְּע֔וֹר הָרְג֖וּ בֶּחָֽרֶב׃

The conflict with Midian reaches its decisive climax not just on the battlefield, but through the targeted dismantling of the nation's leadership. These rulers were the primary architects of the moral catastrophe that recently devastated the Israelites. The execution of the five kings—Evi, Rekem, Tzur, Hur, and Reba—represents the fall of the heads of Midian's central families [בכור שור]. Their names, rooted in Hebrew, reflect their high status and actions [אם למקרא]. Among them, Tzur holds particular significance as the father of Cozbi, the Midianite woman whose public sin with an Israelite leader precipitated a deadly plague [אבן עזרא, רבינו בחיי, שטיינזלץ]. Some traditions even identify Tzur as Balak, the king of Moab himself [משכיל לדוד, שפתי חכמים]. The deliberate recording of their identities serves to highlight God's profound protection over the Israelites; despite facing a vast army led by a formidable coalition of five kings, not a single Israelite soldier perished in the battle [שפתי כהן].

The kings met their end alongside the rest of their fallen nation [חזקוני, שטיינזלץ, אם למקרא]. However, their deaths carry deeper layers of meaning regarding timing and responsibility. Some suggest they were deliberately killed last, ensuring they witnessed the complete collapse of their people, as kingship only truly departs when there is no nation left to rule [שפתי כהן]. Alternatively, their execution alongside the casualties underscores their ultimate guilt. As leaders, they bore the heavy responsibility for every Midianite life lost in a war they provoked [העמק דבר]. The primary approach among commentators is that the grouping of the five leaders emphasizes a divine principle of absolute equality in justice. Just as the kings united in a single conspiracy to lead the Israelites into sin, they shared an equal fate in their punishment [רש״י, רבינו בחיי, מלבי״ם]. They were executed together, fully aware of their royal status, watching one another's downfall [אור החיים].

Amidst the fallen Midianite royalty was Balaam, the sorcerer from Aram Naharaim. His presence on a distant battlefield raises a natural question. Following his devastating advice to use Moabite and Midianite women to seduce the Israelites—a plot that resulted in twenty-four thousand Israelite deaths—Balaam returned to Midian to collect his payment [רש״י, אבן עזרא, תורה תמימה]. He sought out Midian rather than Moab, the nation that originally hired him, due to a stark difference in their motives. Moab acted out of political survival and felt no financial obligation for the aftermath of his advice. Midian, however, was driven by a burning, irrational hatred for the Israelites, going so far as to abandon their own daughters to prostitution. Consequently, they were eager to pay Balaam his full reward [שפתי חכמים, גור אריה]. Another perspective suggests that Balaam initially told Midian he could not curse the Israelites because they were free of sin. Once his plot successfully caused them to stumble, the Midianites summoned him back to finally curse them, leading directly to his demise [בכור שור, חזקוני].

Balaam's execution by the sword is rich with irony and justice. Conceptually, it represents a perfect measure for measure. Balaam abandoned his natural craft of speech and prayer, choosing instead to adopt the violent tools of the surrounding nations to destroy the Israelites. In response, the Israelites laid aside their spiritual craft and confronted him with physical weaponry [רש״י]. He is compared to a camel that demanded horns and instead had its ears cut off; he came demanding wealth for orchestrating ruin, and received his ultimate payment through the blade [תורה תמימה, שפתי חכמים].

The circumstances of his execution are viewed through different historical and legal lenses. He may have been a random casualty, killed simply because he was present when the Israelite army swept through the Midianite camps [שד״ל]. Others argue he took an active role in the conflict, marching out to demoralize the Israelites by mocking the small size of their army, thereby making himself a hostile combatant [רש״י, גור אריה]. Conversely, many commentators emphasize that his death was not a random act of war, but a calculated, legal execution by a judicial court. As a descendant of Noah who violated universal prohibitions against sorcery, his mandated legal penalty was death by the sword [צפנת פענח, העמק דבר, מלבי״ם, אם למקרא]. To ensure a physical victory over the Midianite army, Balaam was specifically executed before the kings, effectively neutralizing his dark spiritual powers [אור החיים]. Finally, an ancient tradition links the very weapon used to kill him to the sword the patriarch Jacob thrust into a stone monument when forging a peace covenant with Laban the Aramean—a sacred pact that Balaam shattered through his actions [רא״ש].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.