ירמיהו, פרק ל״א, פסוק כ״ב

Jeremiah 31:22Sefaria

עַד־מָתַי֙ תִּתְחַמָּקִ֔ין הַבַּ֖ת הַשּֽׁוֹבֵבָ֑ה כִּֽי־בָרָ֨א יְהֹוָ֤ה חֲדָשָׁה֙ בָּאָ֔רֶץ נְקֵבָ֖ה תְּס֥וֹבֵֽב גָּֽבֶר׃ {פ}

A prophet’s voice rings out against a backdrop of exile, distance, and hesitation. God reaches out to a stubborn, runaway nation, urging an end to their evasion while promising an unprecedented future where the familiar world order is completely overturned to bring about redemption. The prophet questions how long this evasion will last. Some commentators understand this hesitation as hiding out of deep shame, making it difficult to return to God [רש"י], or hiding from the eyes of the other exiles [מלבי"ם]. Others explain it as a state of aimless wandering, where the people delay in exile and avoid choosing the direct path of repentance [רד"ק, אברבנאל, ביאור שטיינזלץ, מצודת ציון]. This call is directed at a rebellious daughter, a term highlighting deep-seated stubbornness and defiance [רד"ק, מצודת ציון]. The primary approach among commentators is that this title refers to the people of Israel, though some suggest the plea is actually directed at the Land of Israel itself [מלבי"ם].

To break this cycle of hesitation, God promises to create a completely new phenomenon that defies the laws of nature: a reality where the female pursues, surrounds, or overcomes the male. Commentators offer three distinct ways to understand this striking imagery.

The first approach focuses on the intimate relationship between God and Israel. In the natural order of the world, a man traditionally pursues a woman. Historically, God has always been the one to initiate contact, pursuing the Israelites and urging them to return to Him. The profound shift in this new era is that the female—representing the congregation of Israel—will become the initiator, actively pursuing her husband, God. The people will return to Him willingly and on their own accord, rather than waiting passively [רד"ק, רש"י, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. In a similar vein, this imagery suggests that figures like the matriarch Rachel or the nation as a whole will use their prayers and repentance to surround and move God, stirring Him to grant mercy and goodness [אברבנאל].

A second perspective views this imagery as a complete reversal of global political power dynamics. Israel, long compared to a weak female dominated by harsh, powerful masters like the Chaldeans, will transform into a position of masculine strength, ultimately ruling over the very nations that once enslaved her [מצודת דוד, אברבנאל]. Furthermore, while Israel previously resembled a daughter who receives only a minor share of an inheritance, the nation will soon be elevated to the status of a male heir who inherits everything [רש"י].

The third approach offers a national perspective on the bond between the Israelites and their homeland. In this view, the land itself is the female, and the returning nation is the male. Throughout history, a nation typically has to pursue a land and conquer it through the struggles of war. The historical miracle promised here—which later materialized during the Second Temple period—is that the land itself will actively seek out its people. It will prepare for their arrival, allowing the Israelites to return effortlessly, without the need for military conquest or struggle [מלבי"ם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.