דברים, פרק ל״ב, פסוק כ׳

פרשת האזינו

Deuteronomy 32:20Sefaria

וַיֹּ֗אמֶר אַסְתִּ֤ירָה פָנַי֙ מֵהֶ֔ם אֶרְאֶ֖ה מָ֣ה אַחֲרִיתָ֑ם כִּ֣י ד֤וֹר תַּהְפֻּכֹת֙ הֵ֔מָּה בָּנִ֖ים לֹא־אֵמֻ֥ן בָּֽם׃

A dramatic turning point occurs at this stage of the narrative. God shifts from being an active Father and leader to a hidden observer, deciding to withdraw His protection and leave the nation to the natural consequences of their actions. The text transitions from Moses speaking in his own voice to a direct quotation of divine thought and will, echoing the creative declarations of the world's beginning [רמב״ן, אבן עזרא, רבנו בחיי, ביאור יש״ר].

This withdrawal signifies the removal of the Divine Presence and the cessation of close, miraculous providence during times of distress [רמב״ן, אבן עזרא, רא״ש, ביאור שטיינזלץ, דעת זקנים]. The distance serves a protective purpose, preventing God from actively destroying the nation in anger [מלבי״ם]. It also ensures that He is not swayed by their temporary cries of repentance upon seeing their suffering [אור החיים, מלבי״ם]. Yet, this concealment is not absolute. While obvious providence is removed, God continues to watch from the shadows, fully aware of all their deeds [תולדות יצחק, שפתי כהן].

As God steps back to observe their ultimate fate, commentators offer varying perspectives on His intent. Some view this as a rhetorical, almost mocking stance, where God waits to see if their chosen false idols will offer any real protection [רא״ש, בכור שור, חזקוני, שד״ל, ביאור שטיינזלץ]. Others suggest God is waiting to see how they will respond to adversity, testing whether they will learn their lesson and repent or continue to sin [רמב״ן, אבן עזרא, העמק דבר]. Since God already knows the future, this observation is not born of doubt. Rather, it is a predetermined recognition that they lack the capacity for genuine repentance [ספורנו, הכתב והקבלה], or an acknowledgment that only profound suffering will eventually compel them to return to Him [ביאור יש״ר, שפתי כהן].

The catalyst for this divine abandonment is the profound instability and deceitfulness of the generation. They consistently transform God's will into anger [רש״י, מזרחי] and exploit the goodness He bestows upon them to commit evil [העמק דבר, רא״ש]. Their behavior is marked by extremes. They rebel and worship idols during times of peace, yet desperately cry out to God the moment tragedy strikes [בכור שור, ביאור יש״ר]. This fickleness was vividly demonstrated by their rapid descent from declaring absolute loyalty at Mount Sinai to worshiping the Golden Calf [חזקוני, נתינה לגר].

Despite their treachery, they are still referred to as children, highlighting an eternal bond that remains intact even in the face of grave sin [תורה תמימה, חומש קה״ת]. However, they are children devoid of loyalty. The primary approach among commentators is that they suffer from a complete lack of reliability, meaning their promises are empty and they cannot be trusted [רש״י, אבן עזרא, רלב״ג, מלבי״ם]. Even those who appear righteous are prone to sudden corruption [העמק דבר]. Another perspective links their lack of faithfulness to their upbringing, noting that the moral education and righteous path instilled by God and their ancestors are no longer visible in their actions [רש״י, רמב״ן, ספורנו, ביאור יש״ר]. Furthermore, this unfaithfulness is expressed as a deep ingratitude, symbolized by a refusal to even answer "Amen" to blessings [רבנו בחיי, שפתי כהן, צפנת פענח].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.