שמואל ב, פרק י״ט, פסוק כ׳

II Samuel 19:20Sefaria

וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אֶל־הַמֶּ֗לֶךְ אַל־יַחֲשָׁב־לִ֣י אֲדֹנִי֮ עָוֺן֒ וְאַל־תִּזְכֹּ֗ר אֵ֚ת אֲשֶׁ֣ר הֶעֱוָ֣ה עַבְדְּךָ֔ בַּיּ֕וֹם אֲשֶׁר־יָׄצָ֥אׄ אֲדֹנִֽי־הַמֶּ֖לֶךְ מִירוּשָׁלָ֑͏ִם לָשׂ֥וּם הַמֶּ֖לֶךְ אֶל־לִבּֽוֹ׃

Shimei son of Gera stands before King David, pleading for his life and attempting to minimize his actions during Absalom's rebellion. His carefully crafted appeal distinguishes between his participation in the national uprising and his personal attack on the king. The plea reflects two distinct offenses [מלבי״ם, מצודת דוד]. First, he asks that his guilt not be held against him, referring to his choice to join the broader rebellion. He argues that since so many people followed Absalom, he should not be singled out and judged more harshly than the rest of the nation. Second, he asks that his specific wrongdoing not be remembered, which points to his unique and personal crime of cursing the king [מצודת ציון, ביאור שטיינזלץ].

This personal attack was particularly severe for three reasons. It was an outright curse, it occurred at the worst possible time when David was fleeing Jerusalem exhausted and hunted, and it was done with malicious intent to break and sadden the king's heart [מלבי״ם]. However, some view this focus on the king's heart differently, understanding it as part of Shimei's actual plea, begging David simply not to take the offense to heart or dwell on it [מצודת דוד, ביאור שטיינזלץ].

To save himself from execution, Shimei builds a layered defense. On a personal level, he explains that as a member of Saul's family, he was overwhelmed by bitterness over the loss of their royal dynasty. Because a person is not held fully responsible when blinded by grief, he frames his actions as an unintentional mistake. He even dares to suggest that the suffering David endured that day ultimately worked in the king's favor and saved him, meaning the day should not be remembered as a tragedy [אלשיך]. Politically, Shimei subtly warns David that forgiveness is essential for stabilizing the newly restored monarchy. As the very first rebel to step forward and surrender, his pardon would encourage the rest of the nation to reunite under David, whereas his execution would spread terror and drive the remaining rebels further away [אלשיך].

Finally, Shimei presents a brilliant legal argument. According to Jewish law, a king is not permitted to waive his royal honor, which would technically prevent David from forgiving such a public insult. To bypass this, Shimei argues that on the day David fled Jerusalem, he temporarily lost his kingdom and was reduced to the status of an ordinary citizen. Because the curse was directed at a commoner rather than a ruling monarch, Shimei is not legally guilty of rebelling against the crown and does not face the mandatory death penalty. Now that David has been restored to his throne, he has the power to forgive this past offense from a place of strength, just as Joseph forgave his brothers for the wrongs they committed against him before his rise to power [אלשיך, חומת אנך].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.