בראשית, פרק מ״א, פסוק נ״ד

פרשת מקץ

Genesis 41:54Sefaria

וַתְּחִלֶּ֜ינָה שֶׁ֣בַע שְׁנֵ֤י הָרָעָב֙ לָב֔וֹא כַּאֲשֶׁ֖ר אָמַ֣ר יוֹסֵ֑ף וַיְהִ֤י רָעָב֙ בְּכׇל־הָ֣אֲרָצ֔וֹת וּבְכׇל־אֶ֥רֶץ מִצְרַ֖יִם הָ֥יָה לָֽחֶם׃

The shift from years of plenty to years of drought brings a sudden and dramatic turning point. Rather than developing gradually, the famine strikes with full force the moment the era of prosperity ends. This immediate and severe onset serves a crucial purpose: it completely validates Joseph's predictions. During the years of abundance, skeptics might have dismissed the surplus as a mere climatic coincidence. However, the exact and sudden arrival of the famine, happening precisely as he had warned, proves the absolute truth of his interpretation and his wisdom [אור החיים, צרור המור, ביאור יש״ר, אברבנאל].

The primary approach among commentators is that this abrupt shift marks the straightforward beginning of the famine. Yet, others understand the onset as a physical affliction, suggesting that people immediately became sick and weak from the sudden lack of food [דעת זקנים, חזקוני]. Another perspective takes this idea of sickness further, applying it directly to the crops themselves, which suddenly and inexplicably rotted [שפתי כהן, בעלי ברית אברם].

The devastating hunger spreads across the surrounding territories, though this does not imply a global catastrophe, which would have wiped out humanity. Instead, it refers to the regions bordering Egypt, such as Canaan, Phoenicia, and Arabia [רמב״ן, הטור הארוך, הכתב והקבלה, ביאור יש״ר, מחוקקי יהודה]. A massive regional climate shift disrupts both the countries that rely on rainfall and Egypt, which depends on the Nile River [ביאור שטיינזלץ]. This widespread devastation is not a random occurrence but a calculated part of a larger plan. It ensures that Jacob's sons have no choice but to travel specifically to Egypt for survival, setting the stage for their fateful reunion with Joseph. Furthermore, it forces the surrounding nations to pour their wealth into Egypt to buy food, hoarding riches that the Israelites will eventually take with them when they leave the country [שפתי כהן].

Amidst this widespread desperation, a complex reality emerges: severe hunger grips the region, yet there is bread in the land of Egypt. Several approaches explain this contrast. One view suggests that this food refers exclusively to the national reserves carefully gathered in the royal storehouses under Joseph's direction [רשב״ם, חזקוני, ברכת אשר, קונטרס חיבה יתירה]. Without his foresight, the local population would have simply consumed all the surplus during the years of plenty [רלב״ג]. Another perspective proposes that the Egyptian citizens themselves, and perhaps even residents of neighboring countries [רד״ק], had managed to save enough private food to last through the first year of the drought [רבנו בחיי, אברבנאל]. Alternatively, a third approach describes a harsh, miraculous reality. The Egyptians did possess private stores of grain in their homes, but the food suddenly rotted, or they ate it but felt no satisfaction. Consequently, the crushing weight of the famine was felt in full force, even when food was physically present [אור החיים, שפתי כהן, בעלי ברית אברם].

נעזרתם בפירוש שלנו ומצאתם בו ערך?

עזרו לנו להגדיל תורה ולהאדירה. תחזוקת האתר והשבחת התוכן כרוכות בהוצאות מרובות. תרומה קטנה שלכם תסייע לנו להחזיק את הפלטפורמה ותהפוך אתכם לשותפים מלאים בהנגשת חוכמת המקרא.

תרמו עכשיו

מה דעתכם על הפירוש?

התחברתם? יש לכם חידוש או הארה על הפסוק שלמדתם כאן? נשמח לשמוע!

ההערות שלכם חשובות לנו ועוזרות לשפר את הפירוש.